Islamic Education Curriculum in the Era of Society 5.0: Between Challenges and Innovation

Saca Suhendi

doi:10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1073

Saca Suhendi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1073

Keywords: Educational Curriculum, Islamic Education, Society 5.0.

Abstract

In the era of Society 5.0, Islamic education faces major challenges in adapting its curriculum to rapid technological developments. Changes in the need for skills and competencies require the Islamic education system to be more adaptive to digitalization without ignoring its fundamental values. However, the gap between the traditional curriculum and the demands of the digital era is still a significant obstacle to implementing innovative Islamic education. This study aims to analyze the transformation of the Islamic education curriculum in the era of Society 5.0, by highlighting the challenges and innovations that can be applied to improve learning effectiveness. The research method used in this study is a qualitative approach, by collecting data from various relevant sources, such as previous research and academic studies. The analysis was carried out descriptively to describe the pattern of transformation, obstacles faced, and innovative strategies that can be applied in the development of Islamic education. The results of the study show that Islamic education needs to integrate technology into its learning system to improve the quality and relevance of the curriculum. Although there are obstacles in the application of technology, innovations such as the use of artificial intelligence, blended learning, and data-based analysis can be effective solutions. With the right strategy, Islamic education can not only adapt to the digital era but also maintain its role in building the character and morals of the Muslim generation.

References

Aeiad, E., & Meziane, F. (2019). An adaptable and personalised E-learning system applied to computer science Programmes design. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1485-1509.

Akib, E., Imran, M. E., Mahtari, S., Mahmud, M. R., Prawiyogy, A. G., Supriatna, I., & Ikhsan, M. H. (2020). Study on implementation of integrated curriculum in Indonesia. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(1), 39-57.

Akrim, A. (2022). A new direction of Islamic education in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(01), 35-48.

Bayram‐Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz‐Dominguez, S., ... & Dagan, E. (2019). Science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207-1233.

Behie, S. W., Pasman, H. J., Khan, F. I., Shell, K., Alarfaj, A., El-Kady, A. H., & Hernandez, M. (2023). Leadership 4.0: The changing landscape of industry management in the smart digital era. Process safety and environmental protection, 172, 317-328.

Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.

Ciarli, T., Kenney, M., Massini, S., & Piscitello, L. (2021). Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges. Research Policy, 50(7), 104289.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., ... & Wade, M. (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102456.

Eilam, E. (2022). Climate change education: the problem with walking away from disciplines. Studies in Science Education, 58(2), 231-264.

Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 746.

Gouda, H. (2022). Exploring the effects of learning abilities, technology and market changes on the need for future skills. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12(5), 900-913.

Guex, K., Wicht, S., Besson, C., Degache, F., Gojanovic, B., & Gremion, G. (2020). From sedentary and physical inactive behaviours to an ultra cycling race: a mixed-method case report. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(2), 502.

Kasman, K., & Lubis, S. K. (2022). Teachers’ performance evaluation instrument designs in the implementation of the new learning paradigm of the Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 8(3), 760-775.

Kohnová, L., Papula, J., & Salajová, N. (2019). Internal factors supporting business and technological transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Business: Theory and practice, 20, 137-145.

Lucander, H., & Christersson, C. (2020). Engagement for quality development in higher education: a process for quality assurance of assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 135-155.

Pambudi, N. A., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105092.

Poulton, P. (2020). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: The role of assessment in enabling and constraining primary teachers’ agency. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(1), 35-48.

Prahmana, R. C. I., Hartanto, D., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., & Ali, R. M. (2021). Community radio-based blended learning model: A promising learning model in remote area during pandemic era. Heliyon, 7(7).

Roblek, V., Meško, M., Bach, M. P., Thorpe, O., & Šprajc, P. (2020). The interaction between internet, sustainable development, and emergence of society 5.0. Data, 5(3), 80.

Rymarczyk, J. (2020). Technologies, opportunities and challenges of the industrial revolution 4.0: theoretical considerations. Entrepreneurial business and economics review, 8(1), 185-198.

Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127.

Suciu, M. C., Plesea, D. A., Petre, A., Simion, A., Mituca, M. O., Dumitrescu, D., ... & Nasulea, D. F. (2023). Core competence—as a key factor for a sustainable, innovative and resilient development model based on Industry 5.0. Sustainability, 15(9), 7472.

Sulistiyo, U. (2023). Metode penelitian kualitatif. PT Salim Media Indonesia.

Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., & Marques, R. P. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of era 5.0 for a more humanistic and sustainable society—a literature review. Societies, 12(6), 149.

Temiz, N. (2019). A Lesson Plan Model for Character Education in Primary Education. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(4), 130-139.