Restorative Justice for Blasphemy in Indonesia: Study on the Application of the PNPM Law No. 1 of 1965
Abstract
As is known, the issue of blasphemy in Indonesia became sticking out and rife after the Al Maidah 51 blasphemy case committed by former DKI Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaya Purnama or better known to Ahok, continued with event 212 which became an essential moment in the development of the case other blasphemy cases. The concern is how relevant institutions and the ministry of religion are government representatives react in handling these cases. Because in reality, all these cases always end up in prison. Is this the right solution. This study aims to analyze the role of restorative justice in the handling of blasphemy cases in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach with the literature study method in analyzing this problem.
References
Adji, O. S. (1990). Delik Pers di Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Amnesty International. (2014). Mengadili Keyakinan: Undang-Undang Penodaan Agama Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/208000/asa210182014in.pdf.
Beccaria, C. (1996). Of Crime and Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bangka.tribunnews.com. (2017). Selain Kasus Ahok, Inilah Kasus-Kasus Penistaan Agama di Indonesia. Retrieved from http://bangka.tribunnews.com/2017/05/09/selain-kasus-ahok-inilah-kasus-kasus-penistaan-agama-yang-menghebohkan-di-indonesia?page=2.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 140 / PUU-VII / 2009.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 97 / PUU-XIV / 2016.
Djafar, W., & Abidin, Z. (2014). Membelenggu ekspresi: studi kasus mengenai praktik pemblokiran/penyaringan konten internet dan kriminalisasi pengguna internet di Indonesia. Elsam.
ELSAM. (2007). Perkembangan Konsep Tindak Pidana Terkait Dengan Agama dalam Pembaharuan KUHP. Aliansi RKUHP. Jakarta: ELSAM.
Ijcr.or.id. (2017). Tren Penggunaan Pasal 28 ayat (2) ITE terkait Penyebar Kebencian Berbasis SARA Akan Meningkat. Retrieved from http://icjr.or.id/tren-penggunaan-pasal-28-ayat-2-ite-terkait-penyebar-kebencian-berbasis-sara-akan-meningkat/.
Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (2010). Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Miftahusurur & Sumamiharja. (2007). Delik-delik Keagamaan di dalam RUU KUHP Indonesia, Jakarta: DESANTARA.
Moeljatno. (1996). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Muaro District Court, Verdict No. 45 / PID.B / 2012 / PN.MR.
Mudzakkir. (2010). Tindak Pidana Terhadap Agama Dalam Kitab Undang-undang Pidana (KUHP) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1/Pnps/1965 tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan/atau Penodaan Agama (Kajian Terhadap Praktek Penegakan Hukum dan Prospek Pengaturannya Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia), Jakarta: Pusat Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1984). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Praja, J. S., & Syihabuddin, A. (1982). Delik Agama dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number 71K/KR/1973.
Schaefer, U. (1996). Crime and punishment i. Law and International Order.
Walgrave, L. (2001). On restoration and punishment: favorable similarities and fortunate differences. Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles, 17-37.
Zulfa, E. A., (2009). Keadilan Restorative di Indonesia. (Doctoral Dissertation University of Indonesia).
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Science and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

.png)

.jpg)
.png)

.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)

.jpg)



-modified.png)
-modified.png)


-modified.png)


