Impact of Electronic Agreements from the Viewpoint of the Indonesian Civil Code
Abstract
There are often legal problems, both concerning issues of authenticity, authenticity and proof because there is no law that specifically regulates personal data of agreement users via electronic means. The problem raised is how the problem of the authenticity, authenticity and integrity of the agreement electronically and how the validity of an agreement made electronically. The research method that the author uses is normative qualitative by using secondary data and reinforced by primary data or field data. The results of the study show that the authenticity, authenticity and integrity of the agreement electronically can be carried out using digital forensic tools. The use of information through electronic media concerning a person's personal data must be carried out with the consent of the person concerned. Agreements made electronically/digitally have the same evidentiary power as agreements made through manuals. Judges can use the evidentiary system with the development towards open evidence. Evidence obtained from anywhere as long as the truth can be accepted as long as it does not conflict with public order, considering that in conducting transactions in the current digital era, we will often use online media.
References
Bambang, J. R. (2013). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
CNBC Indonesia. (2020). Buka-bukaan Bos Tokopedia Soal Bocornya 91 Juta Data Pengguna. Retriaved from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20200512133506-37-157889/buka-bukaan-bos-tokopedia-soal-bocornya-91-juta-data-pengguna
Dotulong, T. (2014). Keberadaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Lex Privatum, 2(3).
Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
idcloudhost.com. Kamus Hosting Provider. Retrieved from https://idcloudhost.com/kamus-hosting/provider/
Jelita, I. N. (2020). Data Seluler Bocor, Warga Bisa Tuntut Provider ke Polisi. Retrieved from https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/325719-data-seluler-bocor-warga-bisa-tuntut-provider-ke-polisi
Law Number 36 of 1999 concerning Telecommunications.
Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.
Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.
Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Pertiwi, W. K. (2020). Sidang Perdana Kasus Kebocoran Data Tokopedia Digelar Hari Ini. Retrieved from https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2020/06/10/09144017/sidang-perdana-kasus-kebocoran-data-tokopedia-digelar-hari-ini?page=all
Prasojo, D. (2019). Hal-hal Penting Dalam Perjanjian Elektronik (Clik Wrap Agreement). Retrieved from https://www.daya.id/usaha/artikel-daya/hukum-perizinan/hal-hal-penting-dalam-perjanjian-elektronik-clik-wrap-agreement-
Sa’adah, N. (2020). Akibat Hukum Pembuktian Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 373/pdt.g/2016/pnMdn). Pamulang Law Review, 1(2), 137-150.
Saruji, P. V., & Martana, N. A. Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Tandatangan Pada Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2).
Sitorus, D. A. (2015). Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Internet (E-Commerce) Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uajy.ac.id/7998/1/JURNAL.pdf
Subekti. (2002). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Science and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

.png)

.jpg)
.png)

.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)

.jpg)



-modified.png)
-modified.png)


-modified.png)


